Saturday, 14 November 2009

What ever happened to Urbanism?

What ever happened to Urbanism?

Rem Koolhaas

“How to explain the paradox that urbanism, as a profession, has disappeared at the moment when urbanisation is everywhere – after decades of constant acceleration – is on its way to establishing a definitive global “triumph” of the urban condition”

The ideal model of urbanism is the functional city, described to control and develop the new city. The modernist ideology has failed as they have tried to take control over such a complicated and extensive topic that it has merely scratched the surface and been unsuccessful. When designing a new city or to alter an existing, there are many things that you can not simply control or predict, and it is these that become the challenges of the urbanist.

In our past we have formed cities and failed so many times that we can no longer be sure or confident of the cities we live in today. These former cities have been a representation of our past; they have been formed and developed around our churches, monastery’s and remembrance of our history. This text of Rem Koolhaas discusses how our future needs to move forward to create a city that improves the quality of life as its main objective; we cannot keep looking to our past for guidance. We need to grasp a new regime of values to create a new paradigm, and it is this that will subconsciously alter our perception of how our future cities should form.

“Now we are left with a world without urbanism, only architecture, ever more architecture. The neatness of architecture is its seduction; it defines, excludes, limits, separates from the “rest” – but it also consumes. It exploits and exhausts the potentials that can be generated finally only by urbanism and that only the specific imagination or urbanism can invent and renew.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

Post a Comment